Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Jason Lewis: How the League Looks at the Thanksgiving Mark
Author Message
Jason Lewis
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.17.2013

Nov 27 @ 3:15 PM ET
Jason Lewis: How the League Looks at the Thanksgiving Mark
Lucas Neilson
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Hockeybuzz Fantasy @lucasneilson84 , ON
Joined: 10.04.2013

Nov 27 @ 3:41 PM ET
good write up, i read it all.

I just wanted to add:

Leafs have had a very tough schedule to start the season, back to back games and playing vs really tough opponents. Schedule is much easier as the season goes on.

Im thrilled to see them in a playoff spot to be honest.

thanks Jason!
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Nov 27 @ 4:54 PM ET
Hey Jason, not sure why you're not using Corsi-Close(because the score does dictate corsi, there's plenty of data to back this up).

The actual Corsi standings are:

1. MIN
2. CHI
3. PIT
4. NYI
5. SJ
6. ANA
7. BOS
8. NSH
9. TB
10. VAN
11. DET
12. WPG
13. WSH
14. NJ
15. EDM
16. STL
17. NYR
18. DAL
19. CAR
20. LA
21. FLA
22. MTL
23. TOR
24. OTT
25. PHI
26. ARI
27. CGY
28. CBJ
29. COL
30. BUF


I don't believe Corsi or Fenwick(Close score situations only) is everything, but it's definitely one of the many factors to consider when evaluating a team.
soad_live
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Québec, QC
Joined: 10.23.2008

Nov 27 @ 6:19 PM ET
Hey Jason, not sure why you're not using Corsi-Close(because the score does dictate corsi, there's plenty of data to back this up).

The actual Corsi standings are:

1. MIN
2. CHI
3. PIT
4. NYI
5. SJ
6. ANA
7. BOS
8. NSH
9. TB
10. VAN
11. DET
12. WPG
13. WSH
14. NJ
15. EDM
16. STL
17. NYR
18. DAL
19. CAR
20. LA
21. FLA
22. MTL
23. TOR
24. OTT
25. PHI
26. ARI
27. CGY
28. CBJ
29. COL
30. BUF


I don't believe Corsi or Fenwick(Close score situations only) is everything, but it's definitely one of the many factors to consider when evaluating a team.

- Nucker101



LOL at Corsi damn it.
Mungo
Vancouver Canucks
Location: VANCOUVER, BC
Joined: 03.10.2014

Nov 27 @ 6:40 PM ET
Hey Jason, not sure why you're not using Corsi-Close(because the score does dictate corsi, there's plenty of data to back this up).

The actual Corsi standings are:

1. MIN
2. CHI
3. PIT
4. NYI
5. SJ
6. ANA
7. BOS
8. NSH
9. TB
10. VAN
11. DET
12. WPG
13. WSH
14. NJ
15. EDM
16. STL
17. NYR
18. DAL
19. CAR
20. LA
21. FLA
22. MTL
23. TOR
24. OTT
25. PHI
26. ARI
27. CGY
28. CBJ
29. COL
30. BUF


I don't believe Corsi or Fenwick(Close score situations only) is everything, but it's definitely one of the many factors to consider when evaluating a team.

- Nucker101



facts.... they always ruin a good story!
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Nov 27 @ 6:45 PM ET
Jason Lewis: How the League Looks at the Thanksgiving Mark
- Jason_Lewis

Where are you getting your numbers from? Canucks are 3.0 for goals for not 2.45 & 2.7 for goals against.
kaptaan
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA
Joined: 09.29.2010

Nov 27 @ 9:10 PM ET
good write up, i read it all.

I just wanted to add:

Leafs have had a very tough schedule to start the season, back to back games and playing vs really tough opponents. Schedule is much easier as the season goes on.

Im thrilled to see them in a playoff spot to be honest.

thanks Jason!

- Lucas Neilson


so, yeah, the leafs are in position, but they've done that many times over the last 15yrs and somehow managed to embarrass themselves with a historic nose dive, or some other way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Enjoy it while it lasts, but don't get down if they fall short.
Ersberg
Season Ticket Holder
Los Angeles Kings
Joined: 05.26.2009

Nov 27 @ 9:25 PM ET
Hey Jason, not sure why you're not using Corsi-Close(because the score does dictate corsi, there's plenty of data to back this up).

The actual Corsi standings are:

1. MIN
2. CHI
3. PIT
4. NYI
5. SJ
6. ANA
7. BOS
8. NSH
9. TB
10. VAN
11. DET
12. WPG
13. WSH
14. NJ
15. EDM
16. STL
17. NYR
18. DAL
19. CAR
20. LA
21. FLA
22. MTL
23. TOR
24. OTT
25. PHI
26. ARI
27. CGY
28. CBJ
29. COL
30. BUF


I don't believe Corsi or Fenwick(Close score situations only) is everything, but it's definitely one of the many factors to consider when evaluating a team.

- Nucker101


Stats are pretty much crap when it comes to the post-season. MIN on top? I think we handled them quite nicely, so I wouldn't put too much stock in these numbers.
Jason Lewis
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.17.2013

Nov 27 @ 11:06 PM ET
Hey Jason, not sure why you're not using Corsi-Close(because the score does dictate corsi, there's plenty of data to back this up).

The actual Corsi standings are:

1. MIN
2. CHI
3. PIT
4. NYI
5. SJ
6. ANA
7. BOS
8. NSH
9. TB
10. VAN
11. DET
12. WPG
13. WSH
14. NJ
15. EDM
16. STL
17. NYR
18. DAL
19. CAR
20. LA
21. FLA
22. MTL
23. TOR
24. OTT
25. PHI
26. ARI
27. CGY
28. CBJ
29. COL
30. BUF


I don't believe Corsi or Fenwick(Close score situations only) is everything, but it's definitely one of the many factors to consider when evaluating a team.

- Nucker101



Corsi and fenwick close is another really good indicator that I use but I'm personally still getting used to it on a macro sense.
Jason Lewis
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.17.2013

Nov 27 @ 11:06 PM ET
Where are you getting your numbers from? Canucks are 3.0 for goals for not 2.45 & 2.7 for goals against.
- A_SteamingLombardi


At evens. Sorry. Should have put that in.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Nov 28 @ 4:08 AM ET
so, yeah, the leafs are in position, but they've done that many times over the last 15yrs and somehow managed to embarrass themselves with a historic nose dive, or some other way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Enjoy it while it lasts, but don't get down if they fall short.

- kaptaan


(frank)ing Kaptaan
moondawg
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Island, BC
Joined: 02.01.2007

Nov 28 @ 1:16 PM ET
"Vancouver has a goals for average of 2.45 goals a game at even strength and a goals against of 2.80. So how are they getting it done?"

There were 3 blowouts, I think they were 5, 6, and 7 goals against. In 20 games that will raise your goals against considerable.
Jason Lewis
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.17.2013

Nov 28 @ 7:47 PM ET
"Vancouver has a goals for average of 2.45 goals a game at even strength and a goals against of 2.80. So how are they getting it done?"

There were 3 blowouts, I think they were 5, 6, and 7 goals against. In 20 games that will raise your goals against considerable.

- moondawg



Had to obviously fact check this.

They did indeed lose a couple of blowouts.

Dallas 3-6 (1ppg)
Colorado 3-7 (1ppg)
Kings 1-5
Arizona 0-5 (1ppg)

Discounting powerplay goals the Canucks allowed 20 goals in 4 games which is 4.00 (tough math I know) goals average. Very much raised there overall even strength goals against a couple of clicks.

Good eye moondawg.



Jason Lewis
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.17.2013

Nov 28 @ 8:02 PM ET
Also going to bring up that Montreal, St. Louis, and Los Angeles pretty much ruin corsi close for me since I see those three teams in the bottom half and they are definitely better hockey clubs than those numbers indicate. St. Louis in particular.
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Nov 29 @ 1:49 AM ET
so, yeah, the canucks are in position, but they've done that many times over the last 15yrs and somehow managed to embarrass themselves with a historic nose dive, or some other way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Enjoy it while it lasts, but don't get down if they fall short.

- kaptaan


tkecanuck341
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Irvine, CA
Joined: 06.25.2009

Nov 30 @ 11:41 PM ET
Also going to bring up that Montreal, St. Louis, and Los Angeles pretty much ruin corsi close for me since I see those three teams in the bottom half and they are definitely better hockey clubs than those numbers indicate. St. Louis in particular.
- Jason_Lewis


This is what I'm talking about when I say that people have an overreliance on advanced stats (especially Corsi/Fenwick).

High corsi (close or otherwise) =/= good hockey team and low corsi =/= bad hockey team. It is certainly much easier to be a good team when you have good possession numbers, but you can still be a good team without them.

Last year, Montreal's overall EV CF% was 46.7%, good for 26th in the league, and they made it to the Eastern Conference finals. For comparison their EV CF% (close) was 47.2%, again good for 26th in the league. On the flip side, New Jersey had an overall EV CF% of 54.4%, 3rd overall in the league (54.7% close), and they didn't even make the playoffs.

All those numbers tell us is that last season Montreal won hockey games while being a relatively poor possession team, while New Jersey lost games while being an exceptionally good possession team.